The Federal High Court in Abuja has convicted IPOB leader Nnamdi Kanu on two counts of terrorism, ruling that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.

Justice James Omotosho held that Kanu’s weekly “sit-at-home” directive across the Southeast—enforced through threats and violence—amounted to a terrorist act, noting that only the President can impose movement restrictions under Section 305 of the Constitution.

A witness from Imo State testified that the order crippled social and economic activities for years and linked the killing of former presidential aide Ahmed Gulak to armed men enforcing the directive. A medical report confirmed Gulak died from gunshot wounds allegedly inflicted by ESN operatives.

The judge said Kanu presented no evidence to counter the allegations, effectively conceding the prosecution’s case. He was therefore convicted for leading IPOB, a proscribed organisation—an offence under Section 16 of the Terrorism Prevention Act, which carries life imprisonment or death.

Kanu had earlier been convicted on count one after failing to open his defence and being removed from the courtroom for repeated disruptions. Proceedings continued in his absence.

Tension rose when the court rejected his latest bail application. Kanu protested loudly, insisting on his right to make a final address before security operatives escorted him out.

He has challenged the validity of the charges, arguing the repealed Terrorism Prevention Act cannot sustain the case, and has approached the Court of Appeal to halt judgment. The appellate court has not fixed a hearing date.

Sentencing will follow, with the offence carrying either life imprisonment or the death penalty.